The term theory is derived from a ancient greek word which means looking. So theory is about looking at objects in the world. Moreover, one must distinguish between a theory and a hypothesis. The latter is unproven or even speculative whereas a theory can be rather seen as a description or an explanation. In science a theory is a model or a framework which represents or observes the reality or ideas. In order to come up with a theory, one has to take a step back and observe the object from within a certain distance. An abstract view has to be taken to gain another idea about the object. Since theory is not about doing something it can be set into contrast to praxis. This does not mean that one of both should be valued higher than the other. Both differ only in the way of how they view an object. Both theoretical and practical knowledge are important and only together they can provide a concept of an object which is as complete as it can be in the given context. It is always important to bear in mind that every theory is relative to the context within it is settled. No theory can be considered as truth since it is all influenced by the context, by the store of knowledge at the time when a theory arises. Only in this way paradigm shifts are possible. Such things would not exists if it were not for the context dependence of theory. Nevertheless, an important criterium for theories is that they should be generalisable. Even if a theory cannot be truth it can be useful all the same. But for this purpose it should be applicable in a general context. In my opinion another requirement for a theory is that is should be verifiable. Otherwise it is hardly more than an empty concept. This is also the reason why research is done all over the world to verify theories, achieve a progress and construct new theories. Research can also be seen as the process of producing knowledge. The aim of research is to confirm that our knowledge can be considered as true within the frameworks of the current context. As mentioned in my previous blog entry, data alone is not equal to a theory. But it can be used to support a theory. This is the reason why the major part of research is the collecting of data. But since data cannot simply be found somewhere, there is a need for scientifically approved methods to collect data. However, collecting data is quite similar to constructing theories: it is made up human beings. As theories, data cannot really be objective since it is always filtered in a certain way. For example you begin filtering the data by deciding which data you want to collect. Maybe it would have been more useful to collect other data instead. Or to use a different method to collect the data.
And then again, our theory of theories is nothing more than just a theory. Maybe some day there might also be a paradigm shift concerning this special theory.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI think you did an excellent job to summarize the main concepts of what theory is and what is not. I agree with you that data without any context, theory or hypotheses is worth next to nothing, and can only be used and interpreted within these frames. Research can indeed produce new knowledge, which then again can be used to reflect on the theories used.
I do not agree that theories are verifiable. I think they can be tested through research and then regarded as true. So the more they get tested the more they get the status of being "reliable and true", but without really being verified. That is because you never know what future research will bring and therefore it's impossible to really verify something.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your afterthoughts and in my opinion you did a good job. I especially liked the reasoning of yours and how you differentiate between theory and hypothesis. The whole reflection is very readable and I liked how you brought in your own thoughts. Nevertheless, I would have wished to read at least a little bit how and when the lecture and the seminar influenced your thoughts on the topic.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your afterthoughts and in my opinion you did a good job. I especially liked the reasoning of yours and how you differentiate between theory and hypothesis. The whole reflection is very readable and I liked how you brought in your own thoughts. Nevertheless, I would have wished to read at least a little bit how and when the lecture and the seminar influenced your thoughts on the topic.
You summarized this weeks theme very neatly here! For the reader this wall of text can be a bit tough to get through since you've not really structured it so much. I would have liked more thoughts from you though. Now it seems that you've only used what was said in lecture and seminar. So maybe more about what you discussed and how you thought about what was discussed would've made this reflection even better!
ReplyDeleteKeep it up!
Hi! Thank you for great reflection. It's well structured and you point out all key moments of lecture and seminar. Especially I like your mention about that should be verifiable and the goal of research is to verify theory. Relying on these two statements it's easy to grasp "theory circle" that can be defined as research/analyzing of phenomena - hypothesis - testing - generalizing results - theory - new research - new hypothesis - testing - generalizing results - new theory and repeating steps again. So I think that we cannot consider hypothesis and theory apart from each other and it's even difficult to say what is the primary as hypothesis can be part of existing theory or starting point of investigation and creation of new theory.
ReplyDeleteI agree with most of your points, for example that theory sold be able to be confirmed. However, I wonder if I agree that data collection is the most important part about research. As you say, data isn't objective. With that in mind, shouldn't the focus be on analysing the data you have gathered to make sure that it is not influencing your results?
ReplyDeleteI agree with most of your points, for example that theory sold be able to be confirmed. However, I wonder if I agree that data collection is the most important part about research. As you say, data isn't objective. With that in mind, shouldn't the focus be on analysing the data you have gathered to make sure that it is not influencing your results?
ReplyDeleteHello.
ReplyDeleteNice summary of what characterises a theory. I agree with your statement that theories should be verifiable, but they can not always be seen as truth. Like you are saying, a theory is only true in our framework or 'paradigm'. When a paradigm shift occurs a lot of theories can all of a sudden be considered false. It is important to always bear that in mind. I also like how you are saying that data is always filtered and subjective, which means that data is useless without a theory. This theme has really made me understand the importance of a well thought out and logical theory to back up your research with.
Good job!